There are
many opinions with regard to whether or not an author should include a prologue
in their novels and there are many articles and blog posts written about this very
subject. From the research I conducted
on the topic when I was writing my first manuscript, I would have to say many
appear to be completely against prologues.
I just can’t say with certainty exactly why. I’m guessing it’s due to the fact that some
authors have misused prologues in some way or only use them to dump information,
thereby alienating or misguiding the reader.
I was also
surprised at how forceful some opinions were about the reasons authors should
not use prologues. While I took to heart
what I learned from those opinions, none of the advice I read from others was
going to change the way I planned to introduce the reader to my story. When I first began writing No Mother of Mine there was no question
the initial part of the story had to be a prologue. After the book became available for sale,
much of the response I heard from readers was that the prologue hooked them so
that they wanted to read more. From an
author’s viewpoint, comments like that are encouraging.
While I
would not call it a place I “dump” information, I am using the prologue to “provide”
information to the reader that my protagonist, Jorja, will not learn for some
time. Even then, the reader is left
wondering as they take part in discovering the truth alongside Jorja.
For me,
using a prologue is what works with these particular types of stories. I feel the prologue corresponds to how events
play out in real life and I very quickly decided it is the best approach when introducing
the story to the reader.
My reason
for appreciating the use of a prologue has to do with my professional life as a
private investigator. Every single case I
take on as a criminal defense investigator is after the fact. After an incident has occurred. After a crime has allegedly been
committed. After someone has been
arrested. Beyond those actually present
during the initial event, only a fly on the wall can know the whole truth about
the circumstances surrounding a crime. The
incident or crime itself is the prologue and not something the main character,
in fiction or in real life, is ever personally privy to.
That’s my
reason for using a prologue. While the
reader might not be given all the
information they need to understand exactly why something has happened, I feel a
prologue gives them necessary information to become vested in a case before
they tag along with the protagonist in their attempt to discover the truth.
As I dabble
with other types of writing and stories that aren’t mysteries, prologues probably
won’t be my first choice. But as an
author, I retain the right to do what works best for the story regardless of
whether others believe I’m bending some sort of unwritten rule. It is what makes writing such a great endeavor;
through writing you get to create and through that creation you provide to
others what is unique to you.
So what are
your thoughts? Do you enjoy prologues? Or do you skim or completely skip them? Maybe you have no feelings about the subject either
way. But if you do, I’d like to hear
from you so don’t hesitate to share your opinion or your thoughts.
No comments:
Post a Comment